Monday, April 11, 2016

Week 12 Reflection

            Among the numerous ways to promote healthy eating, two programs that stuck me with curiosity were Farmer’s Markets and Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). While farmers markets are a common way to provide nutritional, affordable food to low-income residential areas, these same areas find difficulty in participating in CSAs. A one time large payment or incremental smaller ones are harder for low-income families to afford and with such a dependence on the crops available for that season families may not like their seasonal options. While these concerns between farmer and consumer can be accommodated through recipes and communication, why don't CSAs target the upper class in urban areas and Farmers Market target low-income neighborhoods to help the appropriate communities who can afford different things?
            I believe this could make a hierarchy within the food system planning that puts farmer’s markets on the lower end of a spectrum, while CSA are on the higher end. If low-income families involve themselves in farmer’s markets jobs to generate higher incomes they could eventually be able to work up to solidifying their ability to consistently purchase from CSA’s. This would create motivation and competition within low-income neighborhoods to increase their economic status. However, creating a hierarchy within the food system planning could create competition between farmers so that farmers from farmer’s markets compete to increase their yields and revenue to switch to CSA’s – or they may want to sell to a higher income community. This would leave low-income communities to fend for themselves yet again, against food swaps and food deserts that engulf them. Without addressing the concerns of income equality to purchase nutritious foods in different systems of food providers, the fear of division and profit may hinder collaboration for a culturally diverse and aware community maintaining sustainable actions.

            Although this blog may be a stretch, it is something that came across my mind while reading. It hypothetically addresses the challenges of different food programs and how they could affect the overall community system. Do you think there’s a chance of this occurring, if not what affects do you see of how food programs interact in positive and negative scenarios.

1 comment:

  1. This is an interesting notion, but I think it is a stretch. I do definitely agree with you that there needs to be more farmer's markets that cater primarily to lower-income populations where there are more cases of food insecurity, but we would still need farmers markets for other socioeconomic groups because they are a good source of nutritious foods. I would just hope that planners and food advocates use farmers markets as a means to foster the interaction and mixing of different socioeconomic and cultural groups. And on the economic thing you mentioned, I think that employment only from alternative food systems would be enough to trigger the economic conundrum you have given, but it would be a great economic driver for the community. I can only imagine good scenarios stemming from more alternative food practices.

    ReplyDelete