In
2014, I spent the summer in Argentina, a country guilty of cultivating GMO
crops. Second to the United States, 17.7% of farmed land is planted with
genetically modified crops (Blatt, 2008). Monsanto (a multi million-dollar
agribusiness) holds a heavy presence in Buenos Aires, standing tall in a high-rise in a prominent area of the city. In the three months I was present, I attended
four anti- Monsanto marches, one of which all protesters were surrounded and
held by police. Although areas around Buenos Aries are being exploited, it is
nothing compared to the rural areas of Argentina. Although most areas in Argentina prohibit the use of agrochemicals around homes and schools, investigators found "many cases of soybeans planted just feet from homes and schools." (Argentina: the country that monsanto poisoned, 2014).
I spent
my summer, planting gardens in the much poorer villas surrounding the
metropolis. One of the villas that I frequented was only 25 km away, but seemed
25 years behind. The goal was to plant an educational garden in one of the kindergartens
in the villa. Unknowingly, this was a much greater task, as this particular
area sat on a landfill. Down the street from the kindergarten, the community
park shared the lot where neighbors burned and dumped their trash, while stray dogs
and horses picked through it. Due to the contaminants found in the soil, in
order to grow a small 4x8 garden a large trench needed to be dug first. Once
empty, a layer of concrete (followed by a layer of brick) was then added to
become the foundation of the bed. Compost from outside of the villa needed to
be brought, as compost from the villa would likely contain contaminants. Once
constructed, this garden would be used to feed the community—a small, 4x8
space.
With
one part of the country directly controlled by large agribusiness and the
other unable to cultivate their land, how do we make sure that every person
gets a balanced plate--let alone a seat at the table?
Melanie, you are asking a very great question. Agribusinesses are looking to increase profit for their shareholders while the working class is having a difficult time choosing between providing a balanced plate or a calorie dense meal for their families within their economic and access constraints. To be honest, I don't think there will be a simple solution to your question after reading the Nestle article, which demonstrated the "food politics" that are involved when our federal agencies are disseminating to the American people on what is the healthiest way to eat. I'm hopeful and believe that with growing awareness and interest in where our food is coming from, we will be able to change the course of our food system, just like we were able to do with tobacco companies.
ReplyDelete