Urban agriculture can be defined as the intersection between local urban planning and agriculture. Traditionally, land use planning has de-emphasized the concept urban planning combining with agriculture as an effort to reduce public health impacts. Large scale farming replaced outdated techniques which ultimately resulted in their removal in the urban setting and into the rural areas.
In modern times, urban agriculture is governed heavily at the local level in the form of community gardens, community outreach programs, training for food production, and etc. In summary, urban agriculture works to address the challenges that metropolitan areas face in the production, distribution, and marketing of food and other organic products. Urban agriculture can be supported in the form of noncommercial, commercial or hybrid methods. Interestingly, urban agriculture finds itself battling the stigma of being a rural activity by not only civilians, but government agencies. As a result, funding tends to be inadequate. The current attitudes posed against urban agriculture will fall in the responsibility of planners and politicians alike to bring awareness and collaboration.
A community in Boston decided that they wanted to design, build, and maintain their own garden by committing themselves to collaborative decision making for the project. Community gardens are a valuable asset in communities with individuals that are low-income or immigrants. The piece weighed the advantages and disadvantages of community gardens in the context of scale, time consumption, effort, and product. The progression of a community garden is heavily based on how far the community wants to take it. According to the piece, the community garden grew into a farmer's market because it increased the community's awareness and interest in food in the perspective of economic development, social justice, nutrition, and public health. In the case of the South End/Lower Roxbury Open Space Land Trust, this heavily diverse community garden founded in the early 90s was initiated by a fundraising event to protect scattered plots in the area. The relationship between the non-profit organization and the local government is remarkable given the fact that most of the beneficiaries, close to 75%, were people of color. How may low-income dense populated individuals that live near MSA's such as - Greater Los Angeles Area, New York City, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale, etc utilize community gardens?
African American owned farmland have went from an estimated 15-20 million acres 50 years following the Civil War to less than 2 million acres in modern times. This dramatic decrease in land ownership amongst black farmers stem from policies in the 20th century. This trend is not limited to politics, in general, popularity of agriculture in the subsequent generations is dwindling. The article examines farmland preservation in conjunction to urban planning using innovative methods and strategies that include commerce and industry. The piece used Warwick Township as a case study reflecting a countywide farmland preservation program in the early 90s. With $100,000 the township invested in a partnership to buy 75 TDRs from farmlands and create a bank, which resulted in negotiation with a township rather than the farmers individually. As of 2002, the township and its partners have bought 447 TDRs and preserved 1,1184 acres to date. Since 2001, the township has put over 688,000 into farmland preservation as a result of 278 sold TDRs, each averaging a modest 1,500 per acre. The article explained the ease of implementing such a plan to be easier in northern U.S due to the fact that in general, there is little public owned land. In regards to developing areas, I wonder how can this type of micro-financing strategy be implemented in those areas that face challenges with property rights?
Urban Agriculture development will need to be sustainable in order to support a growing United States population in terms of: meet human demands, enhance environmental resources and quality, economic viability, and the quality of life for society. The basis for any issue to gain public attention is by scientific research and recommendations. Food systems, although a fundamental components of our ecosystem, lacks scientific research to implement effective policies to directly guide food systems. Examining agroecosystems could provide socioeconomic and public health impacts outcomes. The lack of social entrepreneurial concerns in food systems seems to really be the reason that solutions to food systems come from the local-community level rather than the state or federal level. As majority of our population live in MSA's, I do wonder how sustainable agriculture can be achieved at a large-scale? I would expect that economics of scale may play a significant role in reducing food prices in these areas.