This weeks articles are studies that examine food security and
accessibility given different factors such as income, race, economic development,
culture, and mobility. In the “African Americans’ Access to Healthy Food
Options in South Los Angeles Restaurants,” a study is done between a comparison
group, which had zip codes with less African Americans and a target group with
more. The comparison area was found to have more restaurants per resident with
a difference in customer service offered and also had more places to eat at
then the target area. In addition the comparison group was found to have better
restaurant environments. This trend continues when discussing the health
options and diversity of food. In regards to “Beyond Food Deserts,” research
shows that although there are widespread restaurants throughout the city, the
quality of food is not uniform. In addition, fewer supermarkets and more convenience
stores were found within African American neighborhoods, as well as five times
the amount of fruits and vegetables stores.
The “Food
Deserts, Oases, or Mirages?” study examined whether smaller food sellers helped
community food security within a community. It found that although there were
smaller food vendors with cultural specialties they tended to focus on one demographic
to reap the most profit, so in a way it is helping the larger group of all the
ethnic demographic groups in the area. Within ethnic demographics the “Mobility
Strategies and Food Shopping for Low-Income Families,” finds that people have
four modes of mobility: walking, carpooling, public transit, or buying a car. In
addition, it finds that buying a car increases ones opportunity,
self-dependency, and access. Altogether these articles explore topics readers
may have had at some point in time, but weren’t sure of.
No comments:
Post a Comment